An individual cannot change their gender.

Research Perspectives on Gender Transition and its Impact on the Workplace

The assertion by Bockner et al. that an individual cannot change their gender is a viewpoint that stands in contrast to a significant body of research and the lived experiences of transgender individuals. To understand this complex issue, it’s crucial to examine various research perspectives on gender identity, gender transition, and their implications, particularly within the modern workplace.

Contradictory Research on Gender Change:

Numerous studies across various disciplines contradict the notion that gender is immutable. These studies highlight the distinction between sex assigned at birth (typically based on visible biological characteristics) and gender identity (an individual’s deeply felt sense of being male, female, both, neither, or somewhere else along the gender spectrum). Research suggests that gender identity is intrinsic and develops independently of sex assigned at birth.

• Neurobiological Studies: Some research has explored potential neurological correlates of gender identity. For instance, studies using brain imaging techniques have found that the brain structures of transgender individuals may more closely resemble those of their identified gender than their sex assigned at birth (e.g., Zhou et al., 1995; Guillamon et al., 2016). While this research is ongoing and complex, it suggests a biological basis for gender identity that is distinct from natal sex.
• Psychological and Developmental Studies: Psychological research emphasizes gender identity as a fundamental aspect of self. Studies on transgender children, for example, indicate that their gender identity is often deeply felt and consistent, even when it differs from their sex assigned at birth (e.g., Olson et al., 2015). This suggests that gender identity is not merely a social construct that can be changed at will.
• Endocrinological Studies: The experiences and outcomes of gender transition, often involving hormone therapy, further challenge the idea of immutable gender. Hormone therapy leads to significant and lasting physical changes that align with an individual’s gender identity, demonstrating the potential for individuals to alter their physical presentation in accordance with their internal sense of gender (e.g., Coleman et al., 2012).
• Sociological and Anthropological Perspectives: Sociological and anthropological research highlights the diverse ways in which gender is understood and expressed across cultures and throughout history. The existence of third genders and fluid gender identities in various societies challenges a binary and fixed understanding of gender (e.g., Herdt, 1994).

Authors’ View on Gender Transition:

Without specific research from “Bockner et al.” being provided, it is impossible to definitively state their views on gender transitioning. However, if their research posits that gender cannot be changed, it likely indicates a perspective that emphasizes a more biological determinism of gender, potentially prioritizing sex assigned at birth as the immutable and defining characteristic. This view would likely disagree with the process of gender transitioning, seeing it as an attempt to alter something fundamentally fixed. Conversely, research supporting the possibility of gender transition typically views it as a necessary and often life-affirming process for transgender individuals to align their external presentation with their internal gender identity, improving their mental health and overall well-being.

Impact of Gender Transition on Today’s Workplace (Based on Research):

Research on the impact of gender transition in the workplace has grown significantly in recent years, focusing on various aspects:

• Legal and Policy Changes: Many jurisdictions have implemented anti-discrimination laws that include gender identity, requiring workplaces to be inclusive and respectful of transgender employees (e.g., EEOC rulings in the US). Companies are increasingly adopting inclusive policies regarding dress codes, restroom access, name and pronoun usage, and transition-related leave (Human Rights Campaign Foundation, Corporate Equality Index).
• Employee Well-being and Productivity: Studies have shown that when transgender employees are supported and affirmed in the workplace, they experience lower rates of stress, anxiety, and depression, leading to increased job satisfaction, commitment, and productivity (e.g., Day & Brodsky, 2011). Conversely, hostile or unsupportive environments can lead to significant mental health challenges and decreased performance.
• Workplace Inclusion and Diversity: The inclusion of transgender individuals contributes to a more diverse and inclusive workplace, which has been linked to various organizational benefits, including enhanced creativity, innovation, and problem-solving (e.g., Herring, 2009).
• Challenges and Discrimination: Despite progress, transgender employees continue to face significant challenges in the workplace, including discrimination in hiring, promotion, and termination, as well as harassment and microaggressions related to their gender identity (e.g., Grant et al., 2011; National Transgender Discrimination Survey). Lack of awareness and understanding among colleagues and management can contribute to these negative experiences.
• Transition-Related Support: Research highlights the importance of providing support and resources for employees undergoing gender transition, including access to HR policies, mental health services, and educational materials for colleagues (e.g., World Professional Association for Transgender Health guidelines).
• Economic Impact: Studies have also explored the economic impact of discrimination against transgender individuals, highlighting the costs associated with unemployment, underemployment, and healthcare disparities (e.g., Badgett et al., 2010). Inclusive workplace policies can contribute to economic empowerment and reduce these costs.

In conclusion, the prevailing body of research contradicts the assertion that gender cannot be changed, emphasizing the distinction between sex assigned at birth and the intrinsic nature of gender identity. Gender transition is increasingly recognized as a legitimate and necessary process for transgender individuals. Research on the workplace reveals a growing awareness of the importance of transgender inclusion, driven by legal changes, ethical considerations, and the recognition of the benefits of a diverse and supportive workforce. However, challenges and discrimination persist, underscoring the ongoing need for education, policy implementation, and a commitment to creating truly inclusive workplaces for transgender employees.

References (Note: These are examples and should be replaced with actual research findings):

• Badgett, M. V. L., Durso, L. E., Mallory, C. A., & Sellinger, J. (2010). Bias in the workplace: Consistent evidence of sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination. The Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law.  
• Coleman, E., Bockting, W., Botzer, M., Cohen-Kettenis, P. T., DeCuypere, G., Feldman, J. M., … & Zucker, K. N. (2012). Standards of care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people, version 7. International Journal of Transgenderism, 13(4), 165-232.  
• Day, J. K., & Brodsky, S. L. (2011). The experience of workplace discrimination and harassment among transgender individuals: Results from a national survey. Sex Roles, 65(1-2), 19-38.
• Grant, J. P., Mottet, L. A., Tanis, J., Harrison, J., Herman, J. L., & Keisling, M. (2011). Injustice at every turn: A report of the national transgender discrimination survey. National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.  
• Guillamon, A., Gómez-Gil, E., van Goozen, S. H., Garcia-Falgueras, A., & Kraemer, B. (2016). Brain structure and sexual orientation: meta-analysis of gray matter volumes and white matter microstructure. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(8), 2361-2391.
• Herdt, G. H. (Ed.). (1994). Third sex, third gender: Beyond sexual dimorphism in culture and history. Zone Books.
• Herring, C. (2009). Does diversity pay?: Race, gender, and the business case for diversity. American Sociological Review, 74(5), 822-842.

Last Completed Projects