Various aspects of Earned Value.

Earned Value Management (EVM) provides a significantly more reliable and objective assessment of project status compared to relying on “gut feel.” Gut feel is subjective, based on intuition or incomplete observations, and lacks the rigor needed for effective project control. EVM, on the other hand, is a systematic approach that integrates scope, schedule, and cost data to provide quantifiable metrics about project performance. Here’s a breakdown of why EVM is superior, discussing its various aspects:

1. Objective Measurement of Progress:

• Gut Feel: Relies on subjective impressions of whether the project “feels” on track. This can be influenced by optimism, recent positive events, or a lack of detailed insight into actual work completed.
• Earned Value: Measures the Earned Value (EV), which is the budgeted cost of work actually performed. This provides a tangible, objective measure of how much of the planned work has been completed in terms of its originally assigned value.

2. Integration of Key Project Dimensions:

• Gut Feel: Often focuses on one or two aspects, such as whether deadlines seem to be met or if spending appears to be in line. It rarely provides a holistic view of scope, schedule, and cost together.
• Earned Value: Integrates all three critical constraints of a project:
  • Planned Value (PV) or Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled (BCWS): The planned value of the work scheduled to be completed by a specific point in time.
  • Earned Value (EV) or Budgeted Cost of Work Performed (BCWP): The budgeted cost of the work actually completed by that same point in time.
  • Actual Cost (AC) or Actual Cost of Work Performed (ACWP): The actual costs incurred to complete the work performed by that point in time.

3. Quantifiable Variance Analysis:

• Gut Feel: Can sense that something is “off” but lacks specific data to quantify the deviation from the plan.
• Earned Value: Calculates variances that provide precise measures of project performance:
  • Schedule Variance (SV = EV – PV): Indicates whether the project is ahead or behind schedule in monetary terms. A negative SV means the project has accomplished less work than planned for the time elapsed.
  • Cost Variance (CV = EV – AC): Indicates whether the project is over or under budget. A negative CV means the work performed cost more than planned.

4. Performance Indices for Efficiency Assessment:

• Gut Feel: Offers no standardized metrics to assess the efficiency of schedule and cost management.
• Earned Value: Calculates performance indices that provide efficiency ratios:
  • Schedule Performance Index (SPI = EV / PV): Measures the efficiency of work completion relative to the schedule. An SPI less than 1 indicates the project is behind schedule.
  • Cost Performance Index (CPI = EV / AC): Measures the cost efficiency of the work performed. A CPI less than 1 indicates the project is over budget.

5. Forecasting Future Project Outcomes:

• Gut Feel: Provides little to no basis for reliable forecasting of the project’s final cost and completion date.
• Earned Value: Uses current performance data to project future outcomes:
  • Estimate at Completion (EAC): A forecast of the total cost at the project’s completion, based on current performance. Various formulas exist for EAC, depending on assumptions about future performance.
  • Estimate to Complete (ETC): An estimate of the cost needed to complete the remaining work.
  • Variance at Completion (VAC = BAC – EAC): A forecast of the budget surplus or deficit at the project’s completion.

6. Early Identification of Problems:

• Gut Feel: Issues might only become apparent when they are significant and difficult to recover from.
• Earned Value: By regularly monitoring EVM metrics, project managers can identify deviations from the baseline early in the project lifecycle, allowing for timely corrective actions to get the project back on track.

7. Improved Communication and Accountability:

• Gut Feel: Project status discussions can be vague and lack objective evidence, potentially leading to misunderstandings among stakeholders.
• Earned Value: Provides a common, data-driven language for discussing project performance with all stakeholders. The objective metrics increase accountability among team members as their progress and cost efficiency are measured against the baseline.

In conclusion, Earned Value Management offers a structured, objective, and comprehensive approach to project status assessment that is far superior to the subjective and limited nature of “gut feel.” By integrating scope, schedule, and cost, and providing quantifiable metrics, EVM empowers project managers to make informed decisions, proactively manage risks, and ultimately increase the likelihood of project success.

Last Completed Projects